lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Feb]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH net-next v1 6/7] bpf: Use the bpf_load_program() from the library
From
Date

On 06/02/2017 20:18, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 02/06/2017 08:16 PM, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
>> On 06/02/2017 16:30, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>>> On 02/06/2017 12:14 AM, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
>>>> Replace bpf_prog_load() with bpf_load_program() calls.
>>>>
>>>> Use the tools include directory instead of the installed one to allow
>>>> builds from other kernels.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
>>>> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
>>>> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
>>>> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
>>>> ---
>>>> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile | 6 +++++-
>>>> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_sys.h | 21
>>>> ---------------------
>>>> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_tag.c | 6 ++++--
>>>> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 8 +++++---
>>>> 4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> No objections, but if so, can't we add the remaining missing
>>> pieces to bpf lib, so we can remove bpf_sys.h altogether?
>>
>> OK, I'll send a new patch replacing bpf_sys.h entirely.
>
> Sounds great, thanks!
>

Do you prefer a big patch or one for each replaced function?

[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-02-06 22:31    [W:0.159 / U:0.160 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site