Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH net-next v1 6/7] bpf: Use the bpf_load_program() from the library | From | Mickaël Salaün <> | Date | Mon, 6 Feb 2017 22:30:18 +0100 |
| |
On 06/02/2017 20:18, Daniel Borkmann wrote: > On 02/06/2017 08:16 PM, Mickaël Salaün wrote: >> On 06/02/2017 16:30, Daniel Borkmann wrote: >>> On 02/06/2017 12:14 AM, Mickaël Salaün wrote: >>>> Replace bpf_prog_load() with bpf_load_program() calls. >>>> >>>> Use the tools include directory instead of the installed one to allow >>>> builds from other kernels. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net> >>>> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com> >>>> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> >>>> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> >>>> --- >>>> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile | 6 +++++- >>>> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_sys.h | 21 >>>> --------------------- >>>> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_tag.c | 6 ++++-- >>>> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 8 +++++--- >>>> 4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) >>> >>> No objections, but if so, can't we add the remaining missing >>> pieces to bpf lib, so we can remove bpf_sys.h altogether? >> >> OK, I'll send a new patch replacing bpf_sys.h entirely. > > Sounds great, thanks! >
Do you prefer a big patch or one for each replaced function?
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
| |