lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Feb]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 3.10 000/319] 3.10.105-stable review
    On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 06:46:39AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
    > On 02/06/2017 12:13 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
    > > On Sun, Feb 05, 2017 at 08:09:04PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
    > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.10.105 release.
    > > >
    > > > NOTE! This series is quite large as I've caught up with many pending fixes
    > > > that were submitted for -stable long ago and that I had been holding on
    > > > since 3.10.103 due to limited time. Most fixes address stability issues
    > > > in crypto, net, usb, scsi, kvm, random info leaks, and risks of oopses
    > > > in various subsystems. My pending queue is now empty.
    > > >
    > > > It builds fine here on i586 and x86_64 for allmodconfig and on armv7 with
    > > > mvebu_defconfig.
    > > >
    > > > All patches will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any
    > > > issue with these being applied, please let me know. If anyone thinks some
    > > > important patches are missing and should be added prior to the release,
    > > > please report them quickly with their respective mainline commit IDs.
    > > >
    > > > Responses should be made by Fri Feb 10 10:00:00 CET 2017.
    > > > Anything received after that time might be too late. If someone
    > > > wants a bit more time for a deeper review, please let me know.
    > > >
    > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at :
    > > > https://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.x/stable-review/patch-3.10.105-rc1.gz
    > >
    > > An updated patch was pushed here :
    > >
    > > https://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.x/stable-review/patch-3.10.105-rc2.gz
    > >
    >
    > Better, but unfortunately there is now a different build error.
    >
    > Build results:
    > total: 124 pass: 122 fail: 2
    > Failed builds:
    > x86_64:allyesconfig
    > x86_64:allmodconfig
    >
    > Qemu test results:
    > total: 83 pass: 83 fail: 0
    >
    > Build error:
    >
    > drivers/block/xen-blkback/common.h: In function 'blkif_get_x86_32_req':
    > drivers/block/xen-blkback/common.h:272:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'READ_ONCE'

    Thank you, I didn't realize that one of the Xen patches was depending
    on it. It will make things a bit more complicated but it's easier for
    me to debug an architecture I can more easily test ;-)

    Willy

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2017-02-06 16:11    [W:4.536 / U:0.048 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site