lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Feb]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH] usb: misc: add USB251xB/xBi Hi-Speed Hub Controller Driver
On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 10:44:05AM +0100, Richard Leitner wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> On 02/03/2017 10:03 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 02:44:29PM +0100, Richard Leitner wrote:
> >> This patch adds a driver for configuration of the Microchip USB251xB/xBi
> >> USB 2.0 hub controller series with USB 2.0 upstream connectivity, SMBus
> >> configuration interface and two to four USB 2.0 downstream ports.
> >>
> >> Furthermore add myself as a maintainer for this driver.
> >>
> >> The datasheet can be found at the manufacturers website, see [1]. All
> >> device-tree exposed configuration features have been tested on a i.MX6
> >> platform with a USB2512B hub.
> >>
> >> [1] http://ww1.microchip.com/downloads/en/DeviceDoc/00001692C.pdf
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Richard Leitner <richard.leitner@skidata.com>
> >
> > What is "RFC" about this? If you don't think it's ready to be merged,
> > I'll agree with that and so I've deleted it from my review queue :)
>
> As it's my first patch which adds a new driver I thought (after reading
> [1]) a "RFC" would be appropriate. Isn't it?
>
> As stated in the commit message we tested it internally on an i.MX6
> platform. Therefore, from my/our point of view, it works as expected and
> should be ready to be merged (otherwise I wouldn't have submitted it to
> the ML ;-) ).
>
> So how should I proceed here? Re-send it without "RFC"? Wait for some
> feedback? Something completely different?

resend it without the RFC and I'll be glad to review it for inclusion.

thanks,

greg k-h

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-02-03 10:58    [W:0.469 / U:0.004 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site