lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Feb]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v8 9/9] perf/amd/iommu: Enable support for multiple IOMMUs
From
Date


On 2/24/17 01:11, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> However, I have looked into reworking to not use the extra_regs, and I see
>> that the union in struct hw_perf_event currently contains various PMU-specific
>> structures (hardware, software, tracepoint, intel_cqm, itrace, amd_power,
>> and breakpoint).
>>
>> For amd_iommu PMU, we need additional registers for holding amd_iommu-specific
>> parameters. So, it seems that we can just introduce amd_iommu-specific struct
>> instead of re-using the existing structure for hardware events.
>>
>> I'm planning to add the following structure in the same union:
>>
>> union {
>> ......
>> struct { /* amd_iommu */
>> u8 iommu_csource;
>> u8 iommu_bank;
>> u8 iommu_cntr;
>> u16 iommu_devid;
>> u16 iommu_devid_msk;
>> u16 iommu_domid;
>> u16 iommu_domid_msk;
>> u32 iommu_pasid;
>> u32 iommu_pasid_msk;
>> };
>> };
>>
>> Please let me know what you think, of if I am still missing your points.
> Yes, adding a struct to that union is fine and clarifies things. And
> just because I'm weird like that, there's a u8 hole after iommu_cntr.

Ok, I'll update this in V10 that I'll be sending out this week.

Thanks,
Suravee

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-02-23 19:21    [W:0.090 / U:0.176 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site