lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Feb]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC 30/55] KVM: arm/arm64: Inject irqs to the guest hypervisor
On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 01:24:26AM -0500, Jintack Lim wrote:
> If we have a pending IRQ for the guest and the guest expects IRQs
> to be handled in its virtual EL2 mode (the virtual IMO bit is set)
> and it is not already running in virtual EL2 mode, then we have to
> emulate an IRQ exception.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jintack Lim <jintack@cs.columbia.edu>
> Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
> ---
> virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c
> index 6440b56..4a98654 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c
> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
> #include <linux/kvm.h>
> #include <linux/kvm_host.h>
> #include <linux/list_sort.h>
> +#include <asm/kvm_emulate.h>
>
> #include "vgic.h"
>
> @@ -652,6 +653,28 @@ static void vgic_flush_lr_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> /* Nuke remaining LRs */
> for ( ; count < kvm_vgic_global_state.nr_lr; count++)
> vgic_clear_lr(vcpu, count);
> +
> + /*
> + * If we have any pending IRQ for the guest and the guest expects IRQs
> + * to be handled in its virtual EL2 mode (the virtual IMO bit is set)
> + * and it is not already running in virtual EL2 mode, then we have to
> + * emulate an IRQ exception to virtual IRQ. Note that a pending IRQ
> + * means an irq of which state is pending but not active.
> + */
> + if (vcpu_el2_imo_is_set(vcpu) && !vcpu_mode_el2(vcpu)) {

Is this correct?

Shouldn't you also inject this to virtual EL2 even when virtual EL2 is
already running as long as the PSTATE.I bit is clear?

> + bool pending = false;
> +
> + list_for_each_entry(irq, &vgic_cpu->ap_list_head, ap_list) {

You need to take a lock when iterating over this list.

> + spin_lock(&irq->irq_lock);
> + pending = irq->pending && irq->enabled && !irq->active;
> + spin_unlock(&irq->irq_lock);
> +
> + if (pending) {
> + kvm_inject_nested_irq(vcpu);
> + break;
> + }
> + }

I would prefer to see this check that loops over the AP list as a
separate function that you call, like vgic_vcpu_has_pending_irq.

> + }
> }
>
> /* Sync back the hardware VGIC state into our emulation after a guest's run. */
> --
> 1.9.1
>
>

Thanks,
-Christoffer

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-02-22 14:17    [W:0.563 / U:10.732 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site