Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 17 Feb 2017 13:54:52 +0000 | From | Brian Starkey <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2] drm/color: Document CTM eqations |
| |
What's the verdict? We've got [1] which is about to become another (driver) implementation - better to change before that merges than after I guess.
-Brian
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/2/13/304
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 11:56:55AM +0000, Daniel Stone wrote: >Hi, > >On 15 February 2017 at 11:39, Ville Syrjälä ><ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 06:46:39PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: >>> On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 6:22 PM, Ville Syrjälä >>> <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> wrote: >>> > Hmm. Two's complement is what I was thinking it is. Which shows that >>> > I never managed to read the code in any detail. Definitely needs to >>> > be documented properly. >>> >>> That sounds supremely backwards. I guess we can't fix this anymore? >> >> I have no idea. Anyone else? > >I don't know of any implementation using this; maybe closed Intel >Android stuff? Certainly GitHub showed no-one using it, and neither X >nor Weston/Mutter are using it yet. > >Cheers, >Daniel
| |