lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Feb]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
SubjectRe: swap_cluster_info lockdep splat
Date
Hi, Minchan,

Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> writes:

> Hi Huang,
>
> With changing from bit lock to spinlock of swap_cluster_info, my zram
> test failed with below message. It seems nested lock problem so need to
> play with lockdep.

Sorry, I could not reproduce the warning in my tests. Could you try the
patches as below? And could you share your test case?

Best Regards,
Huang, Ying

------------------------------------------------------------->
From 2b9e2f78a6e389442f308c4f9e8d5ac40fe6aa2f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 16:38:17 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] mm, swap: Annotate nested locking for cluster lock

There is a nested locking in cluster_list_add_tail() for cluster lock,
which caused lockdep to complain as below. The nested locking is safe
because both cluster locks are only acquired when we held the
swap_info_struct->lock. Annotated the nested locking via
spin_lock_nested() to fix the complain of lockdep.

=============================================
[ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
4.10.0-rc8-next-20170214-zram #24 Not tainted
---------------------------------------------
as/6557 is trying to acquire lock:
(&(&((cluster_info + ci)->lock))->rlock){+.+.-.}, at: [<ffffffff811ddd03>] cluster_list_add_tail.part.31+0x33/0x70

but task is already holding lock:
(&(&((cluster_info + ci)->lock))->rlock){+.+.-.}, at: [<ffffffff811df2bb>] swapcache_free_entries+0x9b/0x330

other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:

CPU0
----
lock(&(&((cluster_info + ci)->lock))->rlock);
lock(&(&((cluster_info + ci)->lock))->rlock);

*** DEADLOCK ***

May be due to missing lock nesting notation

3 locks held by as/6557:
#0: (&(&cache->free_lock)->rlock){......}, at: [<ffffffff811c206b>] free_swap_slot+0x8b/0x110
#1: (&(&p->lock)->rlock){+.+.-.}, at: [<ffffffff811df295>] swapcache_free_entries+0x75/0x330
#2: (&(&((cluster_info + ci)->lock))->rlock){+.+.-.}, at: [<ffffffff811df2bb>] swapcache_free_entries+0x9b/0x330

stack backtrace:
CPU: 3 PID: 6557 Comm: as Not tainted 4.10.0-rc8-next-20170214-zram #24
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Ubuntu-1.8.2-1ubuntu1 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
dump_stack+0x85/0xc2
__lock_acquire+0x15ea/0x1640
lock_acquire+0x100/0x1f0
? cluster_list_add_tail.part.31+0x33/0x70
_raw_spin_lock+0x38/0x50
? cluster_list_add_tail.part.31+0x33/0x70
cluster_list_add_tail.part.31+0x33/0x70
swapcache_free_entries+0x2f9/0x330
free_swap_slot+0xf8/0x110
swapcache_free+0x36/0x40
delete_from_swap_cache+0x5f/0xa0
try_to_free_swap+0x6e/0xa0
free_pages_and_swap_cache+0x7d/0xb0
tlb_flush_mmu_free+0x36/0x60
tlb_finish_mmu+0x1c/0x50
exit_mmap+0xc7/0x150
mmput+0x51/0x110
do_exit+0x2b2/0xc30
? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x129/0x1b0
do_group_exit+0x50/0xd0
SyS_exit_group+0x14/0x20
entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x23/0xc6
RIP: 0033:0x2b9a2dbdf309
RSP: 002b:00007ffe71887528 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000e7
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00002b9a2dbdf309
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000
RBP: 00002b9a2ded8858 R08: 000000000000003c R09: 00000000000000e7
R10: ffffffffffffff60 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00002b9a2ded8858
R13: 00002b9a2dedde80 R14: 000000000255f770 R15: 0000000000000001

Reported-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
---
include/linux/swap.h | 6 ++++++
mm/swapfile.c | 8 +++++++-
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/swap.h b/include/linux/swap.h
index 4d12b381821f..ef044ea8fe79 100644
--- a/include/linux/swap.h
+++ b/include/linux/swap.h
@@ -166,6 +166,12 @@ enum {
#define COUNT_CONTINUED 0x80 /* See swap_map continuation for full count */
#define SWAP_MAP_SHMEM 0xbf /* Owned by shmem/tmpfs, in first swap_map */

+enum swap_cluster_lock_class
+{
+ SWAP_CLUSTER_LOCK_NORMAL, /* implicitly used by plain spin_lock() APIs. */
+ SWAP_CLUSTER_LOCK_NESTED,
+};
+
/*
* We use this to track usage of a cluster. A cluster is a block of swap disk
* space with SWAPFILE_CLUSTER pages long and naturally aligns in disk. All
diff --git a/mm/swapfile.c b/mm/swapfile.c
index 5ac2cb40dbd3..0a52e9b2f843 100644
--- a/mm/swapfile.c
+++ b/mm/swapfile.c
@@ -263,6 +263,12 @@ static inline void __lock_cluster(struct swap_cluster_info *ci)
spin_lock(&ci->lock);
}

+static inline void __lock_cluster_nested(struct swap_cluster_info *ci,
+ unsigned subclass)
+{
+ spin_lock_nested(&ci->lock, subclass);
+}
+
static inline struct swap_cluster_info *lock_cluster(struct swap_info_struct *si,
unsigned long offset)
{
@@ -336,7 +342,7 @@ static void cluster_list_add_tail(struct swap_cluster_list *list,
* only acquired when we held swap_info_struct->lock
*/
ci_tail = ci + tail;
- __lock_cluster(ci_tail);
+ __lock_cluster_nested(ci_tail, SWAP_CLUSTER_LOCK_NESTED);
cluster_set_next(ci_tail, idx);
unlock_cluster(ci_tail);
cluster_set_next_flag(&list->tail, idx, 0);
--
2.11.0
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-02-16 09:45    [W:0.238 / U:0.368 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site