lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Feb]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH V8 08/10] ras: acpi / apei: generate trace event for unrecognized CPER section
From
Date
On 2/15/2017 8:52 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Feb 2017 10:16:51 -0700
> Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>
>> @@ -452,11 +454,21 @@ static void ghes_do_proc(struct ghes *ghes,
>> {
>> int sev, sec_sev;
>> struct acpi_hest_generic_data *gdata;
>> + uuid_le sec_type;
>> + uuid_le *fru_id = &NULL_UUID_LE;
>> + char *fru_text = "";
>>
>> sev = ghes_severity(estatus->error_severity);
>> apei_estatus_for_each_section(estatus, gdata) {
>> sec_sev = ghes_severity(gdata->error_severity);
>> - if (!uuid_le_cmp(*(uuid_le *)gdata->section_type,
>> + sec_type = *(uuid_le *)gdata->section_type;
>> +
>> + if (gdata->validation_bits & CPER_SEC_VALID_FRU_ID)
>> + fru_id = (uuid_le *)gdata->fru_id;
>> + if (gdata->validation_bits & CPER_SEC_VALID_FRU_TEXT)
>> + fru_text = gdata->fru_text;
>> +
>> + if (!uuid_le_cmp(sec_type,
>> CPER_SEC_PLATFORM_MEM)) {
>> struct cper_sec_mem_err *mem_err;
>>
>> @@ -467,7 +479,7 @@ static void ghes_do_proc(struct ghes *ghes,
>> ghes_handle_memory_failure(gdata, sev);
>> }
>> #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_PCIEAER
>> - else if (!uuid_le_cmp(*(uuid_le *)gdata->section_type,
>> + else if (!uuid_le_cmp(sec_type,
>> CPER_SEC_PCIE)) {
>> struct cper_sec_pcie *pcie_err;
>>
>> @@ -500,6 +512,12 @@ static void ghes_do_proc(struct ghes *ghes,
>>
>> }
>> #endif
>> + else {
> As an optimization, you can add:
>
> else if (trace_unknown_sec_event_enabled()) {
>
> instead, as then this wont be called unless the tracepoint is
> activated. Will keep the logic from doing anything with
> acpi_hest_generic_data_payload().
>
> Note, that trace_*_enabled() is activated via a jump_label, thus
> there's no branches involved.
>
> -- Steve
Hello Steve,

In v9 I currently have this and the ARM trace event from this series
both wrapped in an
ifdef verifying that CONFIG_RAS is enabled. This resolves the kbuild
failures and
will have this code compiled out when that config isn't enabled. Do you
think I
should use the ifdef or use these *_enabled() functions?

Thanks,
Tyler
>> + void *unknown_err = acpi_hest_generic_data_payload(gdata);
>> + trace_unknown_sec_event(&sec_type,
>> + fru_id, fru_text, sec_sev,
>> + unknown_err, gdata->error_data_length);
>> + }
>> }
>> }
>>
>>

--
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-02-15 17:55    [W:0.065 / U:0.952 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site