Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [RESEND PATCH v2] dt: bindings: as3645a: Fix the example node | From | Dan Murphy <> | Date | Fri, 8 Dec 2017 09:56:18 -0600 |
| |
Resent to include DT maintainers
On 12/08/2017 09:55 AM, Dan Murphy wrote: > Fix the address-cells and size-cells example node > to reflect to the correct representation. > > Signed-off-by: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@ti.com> > Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> > --- > > v2 - Moved compatible to be first in the node - https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10092937/ > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/ams,as3645a.txt | 6 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/ams,as3645a.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/ams,as3645a.txt > index fdc40e354a64..fc7f5f9f234c 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/ams,as3645a.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/ams,as3645a.txt > @@ -59,10 +59,10 @@ Example > ======= > > as3645a@30 {
Rob
Here is an example of the device name being part of the node name.
Should this be changed as well to leds@30?
Dan
> - #address-cells: 1 > - #size-cells: 0 > - reg = <0x30>; > compatible = "ams,as3645a"; > + #address-cells = <1>; > + #size-cells = <0>; > + reg = <0x30>; > flash@0 { > reg = <0x0>; > flash-timeout-us = <150000>; >
-- ------------------ Dan Murphy
| |