Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Jason Wessel <> | Subject | [PATCH 1/2] kdb: Fix handling of kallsyms_symbol_next() return value | Date | Wed, 6 Dec 2017 16:33:44 -0600 |
| |
From: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
kallsyms_symbol_next() returns a boolean (true on success). Currently kdb_read() tests the return value with an inequality that unconditionally evaluates to true.
This is fixed in the obvious way and, since the conditional branch is supposed to be unreachable, we also add a WARN_ON().
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org> Cc: linux-stable <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com> --- kernel/debug/kdb/kdb_io.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/debug/kdb/kdb_io.c b/kernel/debug/kdb/kdb_io.c index e74be38..ed5d349 100644 --- a/kernel/debug/kdb/kdb_io.c +++ b/kernel/debug/kdb/kdb_io.c @@ -350,7 +350,7 @@ static char *kdb_read(char *buffer, size_t bufsize) } kdb_printf("\n"); for (i = 0; i < count; i++) { - if (kallsyms_symbol_next(p_tmp, i) < 0) + if (WARN_ON(!kallsyms_symbol_next(p_tmp, i))) break; kdb_printf("%s ", p_tmp); *(p_tmp + len) = '\0'; -- 1.9.1
| |