lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Dec]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] cpufreq: longhaul: Set transition_delay_us to 20 ms
> >> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/longhaul.c b/drivers/cpufreq/longhaul.c
> >> > index c46a12df40dd..56eafcb07859 100644
> >> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/longhaul.c
> >> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/longhaul.c
> >> > @@ -894,7 +894,7 @@ static int longhaul_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> >> > if ((longhaul_version != TYPE_LONGHAUL_V1) && (scale_voltage != 0))
> >> > longhaul_setup_voltagescaling();
> >> >
> >> > - policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency = 200000; /* nsec */
> >> > + policy->transition_delay_us = 20000; /* usec */
> >> >
> >> > return cpufreq_table_validate_and_show(policy, longhaul_table);
> >> > }
> >>
> >> This patch also works on my EPIA-M board - tested 10+ times.
> >
> > An on the last try just after sending the mail, it hung again in the
> > same way as before - so maybe 20 is on the edge of being good.
>
> OK, so can you please try to modify the patch to set
> transition_delay_us to 30000, say, and see if that's reliable?

30000 was not reliable.

I created root cron job
@reboot sleep 120; /sbin/reboot

and by the evening it was dead again.

Will try 50000 tomorrow.

--
Meelis Roos (mroos@linux.ee

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-12-06 19:25    [W:0.175 / U:2.492 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site