lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Dec]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC 0/3] Safe, dynamically (un)loadable LSMs
On Wed, 6 Dec 2017, Sargun Dhillon wrote:

> Should I respin this patch sans module unloading? Still a set of dynamic
> hooks that are independent to allow for sealable memory support.

Yes, please.

> I'm also wondering what people think of the fs change? I don't think
> that it makes a lot of sense just having one giant list. I was thinking
> it might make more sense using the module_name instead.

I don't know how useful this will be in practice. Who/what will be
looking at these entries and why?


--
James Morris
<james.l.morris@oracle.com>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-12-07 01:02    [W:0.059 / U:0.532 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site