lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Dec]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 4/7 v2] net: ethernet: i825xx: Fix platform_get_irq's error checking
From
Date
Hi David,


On Monday 04 December 2017 11:55 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 23:18:20 +0530
>
>> @@ -120,9 +120,10 @@ static int sni_82596_probe(struct platform_device *dev)
>> netdevice->dev_addr[5] = readb(eth_addr + 0x06);
>> iounmap(eth_addr);
>>
>> - if (!netdevice->irq) {
>> + if (netdevice->irq <= 0) {
>> printk(KERN_ERR "%s: IRQ not found for i82596 at 0x%lx\n",
>> __FILE__, netdevice->base_addr);
>> + retval = netdevice->irq ? netdevice->irq : -ENODEV;
>> goto probe_failed;
>> }
> Ok, thinking about this some more...
>
> It is impossible to use platform_get_irq() without every single call
> site having this funny:
>
> ret = val ? val : -ENODEV;
>
> sequence.
>
> This is unnecessary duplication and it is also error prone, so I
> really think this logic belongs in platform_get_irq() itself. It can
> convert '0' to -ENODEV and that way we need no special logic in the
> callers at all.
platform_get_irq() will return 0 only for sparc, If sparc initialize
platform
data irq[PROMINTR_MAX] as zero. Otherwise platform_get_irq() will never
return
0. It will return either IRQ number or error (as negative number). But I
am getting
review comment by reviewer/maintainer in other subsystem to add check for
zero. So I have done same changes here. Please correct me if i am wrong.

~arvind

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-12-05 06:35    [W:0.080 / U:0.028 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site