Messages in this thread | | | From | Dmitry Vyukov <> | Date | Tue, 5 Dec 2017 10:19:07 +0100 | Subject | Re: possible deadlock in generic_file_write_iter (2) |
| |
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 5:58 AM, Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> wrote: > On 12/4/2017 5:33 PM, Jan Kara wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> adding Peter and Byungchul to CC since the lockdep report just looks >> strange and cross-release seems to be involved. Guys, how did #5 get into >> the lock chain and what does put_ucounts() have to do with sb_writers >> there? Thanks! > > > Hello Jan, > > In order to get full stack of #5, we have to pass a boot param, > "crossrelease_fullstack", to the kernel. Now that it only informs > put_ucounts() in the call trace, it's hard to find out what exactly > happened at that time, but I can tell #5 shows: > > When acquire(sb_writers) in put_ucounts(), it was on the way to > complete((completion)&req.done) of wait_for_completion() in > devtmpfs_create_node(). > > If acquire(sb_writers) in put_ucounts() is stuck, then > wait_for_completion() in devtmpfs_create_node() would be also > stuck, since complete() being in the context of acquire(sb_writers) > cannot be called. > > This is why cross-release added the lock chain.
Hi,
What is cross-release? Is it something new? Should we always enable crossrelease_fullstack during testing?
Thanks
| |