lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Dec]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/8] [media] uvc_video: use ktime_t for timestamps
Date
Hi Arnd,

On Tuesday, 5 December 2017 02:37:27 EET Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> On Monday, 27 November 2017 15:19:54 EET Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > uvc_video_get_ts() returns a 'struct timespec', but all its users
> > really want a nanoseconds variable anyway.
> >
> > Changing the deprecated ktime_get_ts/ktime_get_real_ts to ktime_get
> > and ktime_get_real simplifies the code noticeably, while keeping
> > the resulting numbers unchanged.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> > ---
> >
> > drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_video.c | 37 ++++++++++++---------------------
> > drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvcvideo.h | 2 +-
> > 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

[snip]

> > - struct timespec ts;
> > + u64 timestamp;

[snip]

> > uvc_trace(UVC_TRACE_CLOCK, "%s: SOF %u.%06llu y %llu ts %llu "
> > "buf ts %llu (x1 %u/%u/%u x2 %u/%u/%u y1 %u y2 %u)\n",
> > stream->dev->name,
> > sof >> 16, div_u64(((u64)sof & 0xffff) * 1000000LLU, 65536),
> > - y, timespec_to_ns(&ts), vbuf->vb2_buf.timestamp,
> > + y, timestamp, vbuf->vb2_buf.timestamp,
> > x1, first->host_sof, first->dev_sof,
> > x2, last->host_sof, last->dev_sof, y1, y2);

As you've done lots of work moving code away from timespec I figured out I
would ask, what is the preferred way to print a ktime in secs.nsecs format ?
Should I use ktime_to_timespec and print ts.tv_sec and ts.tv_nsec, or is there
a better way ?

--
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-12-05 01:58    [W:0.054 / U:0.864 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site