Messages in this thread | | | From | Andy Shevchenko <> | Date | Thu, 28 Dec 2017 13:57:22 +0200 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] dt-bindings: at24: consistently document the compatible property |
| |
On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 12:49 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> wrote: > Current description of the compatible property for at24 is quite vague. > > State explicitly that any "<manufacturer>,<model>" pair is accepted as > long as a correct fallback is used for non-atmel chips.
> - "atmel,24c00", "atmel,24c01", "atmel,24c02", "atmel,24c04", > - "atmel,24c08", "atmel,24c16", "atmel,24c32", "atmel,24c64", > - "atmel,24c128", "atmel,24c256", "atmel,24c512", "atmel,24c1024"
> + "atmel,24c00", > + "atmel,24c01", > + "atmel,24c02", > + "atmel,spd", > + "atmel,24c04",
Just to whom it may concern, I still don't like the ordering. By name is better to read and catch up the (un)supported chips.
-- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
| |