lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Dec]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v19 3/7] xbitmap: add more operations
From
Date
Wei Wang wrote:
> I used the example of xb_clear_bit_range(), and xb_find_next_bit() is
> the same fundamentally. Please let me know if anywhere still looks fuzzy.

I don't think it is the same for xb_find_next_bit() with set == 0.

+ if (radix_tree_exception(bmap)) {
+ unsigned long tmp = (unsigned long)bmap;
+ unsigned long ebit = bit + 2;
+
+ if (ebit >= BITS_PER_LONG)
+ continue;
+ if (set)
+ ret = find_next_bit(&tmp, BITS_PER_LONG, ebit);
+ else
+ ret = find_next_zero_bit(&tmp, BITS_PER_LONG,
+ ebit);
+ if (ret < BITS_PER_LONG)
+ return ret - 2 + IDA_BITMAP_BITS * index;

What I'm saying is that find_next_zero_bit() will not be called if you do
"if (ebit >= BITS_PER_LONG) continue;" before calling find_next_zero_bit().

When scanning "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001",
"bit < BITS_PER_LONG - 2" case finds "0" in this word but
"bit >= BITS_PER_LONG - 2" case finds "0" in next word or segment.

I can't understand why this is correct behavior. It is too much puzzling.



> > Also, one more thing you need to check. Have you checked how long does
> > xb_find_next_set_bit(xb, 0, ULONG_MAX) on an empty xbitmap takes?
> > If it causes soft lockup warning, should we add cond_resched() ?
> > If yes, you have to document that this API might sleep. If no, you
> > have to document that the caller of this API is responsible for
> > not to pass such a large value range.
>
> Yes, that will take too long time. Probably we can document some
> comments as a reminder for the callers.
>

Then, I feel that API is poorly implemented. There is no need to brute-force
when scanning [0, ULONG_MAX] range. If you eliminate exception path and
redesign the data structure, xbitmap will become as simple as a sample
implementation shown below. Not tested yet, but I think that this will be
sufficient for what virtio-baloon wants to do; i.e. find consecutive "1" bits
quickly. I didn't test whether finding "struct ulong_list_data" using radix
tree can improve performance.

----------------------------------------
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>

#define BITMAP_LEN 1024

struct ulong_list_data {
struct list_head list;
unsigned long segment; /* prev->segment < segment < next->segment */
unsigned long bits; /* Number of bits set in this offset bitmap. */
unsigned long *bitmap; /* Offset bitmap of BITMAP_LEN bits. */
};

static struct ulong_list_data null_ulong_list = {
{ NULL, NULL }, ULONG_MAX, 0, NULL
};

struct ulong_list_head {
struct list_head list;
struct ulong_list_data *last_used;
};

static void init_ulong(struct ulong_list_head *head)
{
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&head->list);
head->last_used = &null_ulong_list;
}

static bool set_ulong(struct ulong_list_head *head, const unsigned long value)
{
struct ulong_list_data *ptr = head->last_used;
struct list_head *list = &head->list;
const unsigned long segment = value / BITMAP_LEN;
const unsigned long offset = value % BITMAP_LEN;
bool found = false;

if (ptr->segment == segment)
goto shortcut;
list_for_each_entry(ptr, &head->list, list) {
if (ptr->segment < segment) {
list = &ptr->list;
continue;
}
found = ptr->segment == segment;
break;
}
if (!found) {
ptr = kzalloc(sizeof(*ptr), GFP_NOWAIT | __GFP_NOWARN);
if (!ptr)
return false;
ptr->bitmap = kzalloc(BITMAP_LEN / 8,
GFP_NOWAIT | __GFP_NOWARN);
if (!ptr->bitmap) {
kfree(ptr);
return false;
}
ptr->segment = segment;
list_add(&ptr->list, list);
}
head->last_used = ptr;
shortcut:
if (!test_bit(offset, ptr->bitmap)) {
__set_bit(offset, ptr->bitmap);
ptr->bits++;
}
return true;
}

static void clear_ulong(struct ulong_list_head *head, const unsigned long value)
{
struct ulong_list_data *ptr = head->last_used;
const unsigned long segment = value / BITMAP_LEN;
const unsigned long offset = value % BITMAP_LEN;

if (ptr->segment == segment)
goto shortcut;
list_for_each_entry(ptr, &head->list, list) {
if (ptr->segment < segment)
continue;
if (ptr->segment == segment) {
head->last_used = ptr;
shortcut:
if (test_bit(offset, ptr->bitmap)) {
__clear_bit(offset, ptr->bitmap);
if (--ptr->bits)
return;
if (head->last_used == ptr)
head->last_used = &null_ulong_list;
list_del(&ptr->list);
kfree(ptr);
}
}
return;
}
}

static void destroy_ulong(struct ulong_list_head *head)
{
struct ulong_list_data *ptr;
struct ulong_list_data *tmp;

list_for_each_entry_safe(ptr, tmp, &head->list, list) {
list_del(&ptr->list);
kfree(ptr);
}
init_ulong(head);
}

static unsigned long get_ulong_set_range(struct ulong_list_head *head,
unsigned long *start)
{
struct ulong_list_data *ptr;
unsigned long segment = *start / BITMAP_LEN;
unsigned int offset = *start % BITMAP_LEN;
unsigned long ret = BITMAP_LEN;

list_for_each_entry(ptr, &head->list, list) {
if (ptr->segment < segment)
continue;
if (ptr->segment > segment)
offset = 0;
ret = find_next_bit(ptr->bitmap, BITMAP_LEN, offset);
if (ret == BITMAP_LEN)
continue;
break;
}
if (ret == BITMAP_LEN)
return 0;
segment = ptr->segment;
*start = segment * BITMAP_LEN + ret;
ret = find_next_zero_bit(ptr->bitmap, BITMAP_LEN, ret);
if (ret < BITMAP_LEN || segment == ULONG_MAX / BITMAP_LEN)
return segment * BITMAP_LEN + ret - *start;
ret = 0;
list_for_each_entry_continue(ptr, &head->list, list) {
if (ptr->segment != ++segment)
break;
if (ptr->bits == BITMAP_LEN)
continue;
ret = find_next_zero_bit(ptr->bitmap, BITMAP_LEN, 0);
break;
}
return segment * BITMAP_LEN + ret - *start;
}

static int __init test_init(void)
{
struct ulong_list_data *ptr;
struct ulong_list_head head;
unsigned long start = 0;
unsigned long len;

init_ulong(&head);

set_ulong(&head, 0);
set_ulong(&head, 10);
set_ulong(&head, 11);
set_ulong(&head, ULONG_MAX);
set_ulong(&head, 1000000);
set_ulong(&head, 12);
clear_ulong(&head, 11);
for (len = 1048576; len < 1048576 + BITMAP_LEN * 3; len++)
set_ulong(&head, len);
clear_ulong(&head, 1048600);
set_ulong(&head, 2000000000);

pr_info("Debug dump start\n");
list_for_each_entry(ptr, &head.list, list)
pr_info("Segment %lu %lu\n", ptr->segment, ptr->bits);
pr_info("Debug dump end\n");

while ((len = get_ulong_set_range(&head, &start)) > 0) {
pr_info("Range %lu@%lu\n", len, start);
start += len;
if (!start)
break;
}
destroy_ulong(&head);
return -EINVAL;
}

module_init(test_init);
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
----------------------------------------

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-12-14 17:31    [W:0.117 / U:0.680 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site