Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 13 Dec 2017 22:34:32 -0500 (EST) | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/2] hp100: Fix a possible sleep-in-atomic bug in hp100_login_to_vg_hub | From | David Miller <> |
| |
From: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 11:13:15 +0800
> Thanks for reply :) > I think I should use "udelay(100000/HZ)" instead, do you think it is > right?
The delay is too long, please do not ignore that part of my critique of your change.
You cannot delay so long under a lock, that's why the code is trying to use a sleeping delay.
I'm not going to explain this problem another time.
| |