lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Dec]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 0/4] Fixes for omapdrm on OpenPandora and GTA04
Date
On Thursday, November 30, 2017 12:54:07 PM Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> On 28/11/17 17:48, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
> > Changes V3:
> > * stay compatible with old DTB files which still use "toppoly" (suggested by Tomi Valkeinen)
> > * replaced MODULE_ALIAS entries by MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE (suggested by Andrew F. Davis)
> > * removed DSI VDDS patch as it has already been accepted
> >
> > 2017-11-16 09:50:22: Changes V2:
> > * replaced patch to fix DSI VDDS for OMAP3 by equivalent patch from Laurent Pinchart
> > * keep previous compatibility option in panel driver to handle older device tree binaries
> >
> > 2017-11-08 22:09:36:
> > This patch set fixes vendor names of the panels
> > and fixes a problem on omapdrm with enabling
> > VDD_DSI for OMAP3 which is needed for displaying
> > the Red and Green channel on OMAP3530 (Pandora).
> >
> > H. Nikolaus Schaller (4):
> > omapdrm: panel: fix compatible vendor string for td028ttec1
> > omapdrm: panel: td028ttec1: replace MODULE_ALIAS by
> > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE
> > DTS: GTA04: fix panel compatibility string
> > DTS: Pandora: fix panel compatibility string
> >
> > .../panel/{toppoly,td028ttec1.txt => tpo,td028ttec1.txt} | 4 ++--
> > arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-gta04.dtsi | 2 +-
> > arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-pandora-common.dtsi | 2 +-
> > drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/displays/panel-tpo-td028ttec1.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
> > .../fbdev/omap2/omapfb/displays/panel-tpo-td028ttec1.c | 12 +++++++++++-
> > 5 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > rename Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/{toppoly,td028ttec1.txt => tpo,td028ttec1.txt} (84%)
> >
>
> Thanks. I have picked up patches 1 and 2.

Thanks for taking care of them (they both look fine to me).

> 3 can be applied when 1 & 2 are in. The change in 4 could be applied
> independently, but it conflicts with 3.
>
> Tony, how do you want to handle 3 and 4? I will push 1 and 2 to v4.16. I
> don't think they are real issues, so I don't see a reason to push them
> as fixes to v4.15. I think they are mostly just cleanups, and we might
> as well wait until v4.17, but that's quite far away...

Best regards,
--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-12-01 18:23    [W:0.092 / U:0.556 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site