lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Nov]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [kernel-hardening] Re: [PATCH resend 2/2] userns: control capabilities of some user namespaces
From
Date
On 11/09/2017 01:05 PM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Would the existing capability bounding set not suffice for that?
>
> The 'permanent' bounding set turns out to not be a good fit for
> the problem being discussed in this thread, but please feel free
> to start a new thread if you want to discuss your use case.

Sure. I will formulate something for a new thread. What seems to be
asked for here is a way to globally patch the capability sets of a
entire process subtree.

-chrish

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-11-09 19:29    [W:0.246 / U:0.048 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site