lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Nov]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
Subject[tip:x86/asm] x86/mm: Add Secure Encrypted Virtualization (SEV) support
Commit-ID:  d8aa7eea78a1401cce39b3bb61ead0150044a3df
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/d8aa7eea78a1401cce39b3bb61ead0150044a3df
Author: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
AuthorDate: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 09:30:44 -0500
Committer: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
CommitDate: Tue, 7 Nov 2017 15:35:54 +0100

x86/mm: Add Secure Encrypted Virtualization (SEV) support

Provide support for Secure Encrypted Virtualization (SEV). This initial
support defines a flag that is used by the kernel to determine if it is
running with SEV active.

Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Tested-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171020143059.3291-3-brijesh.singh@amd.com

---
arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h | 6 ++++++
arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/mem_encrypt.h | 7 +++++--
3 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
index 6a77c63..2b02474 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
@@ -47,6 +47,9 @@ void __init mem_encrypt_init(void);

void swiotlb_set_mem_attributes(void *vaddr, unsigned long size);

+bool sme_active(void);
+bool sev_active(void);
+
#else /* !CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT */

#define sme_me_mask 0ULL
@@ -64,6 +67,9 @@ static inline void __init sme_early_init(void) { }
static inline void __init sme_encrypt_kernel(void) { }
static inline void __init sme_enable(struct boot_params *bp) { }

+static inline bool sme_active(void) { return false; }
+static inline bool sev_active(void) { return false; }
+
#endif /* CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT */

/*
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c b/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c
index 16c5f37..add836d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c
@@ -42,6 +42,8 @@ static char sme_cmdline_off[] __initdata = "off";
u64 sme_me_mask __section(.data) = 0;
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sme_me_mask);

+static bool sev_enabled __section(.data);
+
/* Buffer used for early in-place encryption by BSP, no locking needed */
static char sme_early_buffer[PAGE_SIZE] __aligned(PAGE_SIZE);

@@ -192,6 +194,30 @@ void __init sme_early_init(void)
protection_map[i] = pgprot_encrypted(protection_map[i]);
}

+/*
+ * SME and SEV are very similar but they are not the same, so there are
+ * times that the kernel will need to distinguish between SME and SEV. The
+ * sme_active() and sev_active() functions are used for this. When a
+ * distinction isn't needed, the mem_encrypt_active() function can be used.
+ *
+ * The trampoline code is a good example for this requirement. Before
+ * paging is activated, SME will access all memory as decrypted, but SEV
+ * will access all memory as encrypted. So, when APs are being brought
+ * up under SME the trampoline area cannot be encrypted, whereas under SEV
+ * the trampoline area must be encrypted.
+ */
+bool sme_active(void)
+{
+ return sme_me_mask && !sev_enabled;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sme_active);
+
+bool sev_active(void)
+{
+ return sme_me_mask && sev_enabled;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sev_active);
+
/* Architecture __weak replacement functions */
void __init mem_encrypt_init(void)
{
diff --git a/include/linux/mem_encrypt.h b/include/linux/mem_encrypt.h
index 265a9cd..b310a9c 100644
--- a/include/linux/mem_encrypt.h
+++ b/include/linux/mem_encrypt.h
@@ -23,11 +23,14 @@

#define sme_me_mask 0ULL

+static inline bool sme_active(void) { return false; }
+static inline bool sev_active(void) { return false; }
+
#endif /* CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_MEM_ENCRYPT */

-static inline bool sme_active(void)
+static inline bool mem_encrypt_active(void)
{
- return !!sme_me_mask;
+ return sme_me_mask;
}

static inline u64 sme_get_me_mask(void)
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-11-08 21:05    [W:0.238 / U:0.692 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site