| From | Ben Hutchings <> | Date | Mon, 06 Nov 2017 23:03:07 +0000 | Subject | [PATCH 3.2 046/147] perf: Tighten (and fix) the grouping condition |
| |
3.2.95-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
commit c3c87e770458aa004bd7ed3f29945ff436fd6511 upstream.
The fix from 9fc81d87420d ("perf: Fix events installation during moving group") was incomplete in that it failed to recognise that creating a group with events for different CPUs is semantically broken -- they cannot be co-scheduled.
Furthermore, it leads to real breakage where, when we create an event for CPU Y and then migrate it to form a group on CPU X, the code gets confused where the counter is programmed -- triggered in practice as well by me via the perf fuzzer.
Fix this by tightening the rules for creating groups. Only allow grouping of counters that can be co-scheduled in the same context. This means for the same task and/or the same cpu.
Fixes: 9fc81d87420d ("perf: Fix events installation during moving group") Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150123125834.090683288@infradead.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> --- include/linux/perf_event.h | 6 ------ kernel/events/core.c | 15 +++++++++++++-- 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
--- a/include/linux/perf_event.h +++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h @@ -859,11 +859,6 @@ struct perf_event { #endif /* CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS */ }; -enum perf_event_context_type { - task_context, - cpu_context, -}; - /** * struct perf_event_context - event context structure * @@ -871,7 +866,6 @@ enum perf_event_context_type { */ struct perf_event_context { struct pmu *pmu; - enum perf_event_context_type type; /* * Protect the states of the events in the list, * nr_active, and the list: --- a/kernel/events/core.c +++ b/kernel/events/core.c @@ -6116,7 +6116,6 @@ skip_type: __perf_event_init_context(&cpuctx->ctx); lockdep_set_class(&cpuctx->ctx.mutex, &cpuctx_mutex); lockdep_set_class(&cpuctx->ctx.lock, &cpuctx_lock); - cpuctx->ctx.type = cpu_context; cpuctx->ctx.pmu = pmu; cpuctx->jiffies_interval = 1; INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cpuctx->rotation_list); @@ -6697,7 +6696,19 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(perf_event_open, * task or CPU context: */ if (move_group) { - if (group_leader->ctx->type != ctx->type) + /* + * Make sure we're both on the same task, or both + * per-cpu events. + */ + if (group_leader->ctx->task != ctx->task) + goto err_context; + + /* + * Make sure we're both events for the same CPU; + * grouping events for different CPUs is broken; since + * you can never concurrently schedule them anyhow. + */ + if (group_leader->cpu != event->cpu) goto err_context; } else { if (group_leader->ctx != ctx)
|