Messages in this thread |  | | Subject | Re: ALSA: nm256: Fine-tuning for three function implementations | From | SF Markus Elfring <> | Date | Tue, 28 Nov 2017 15:19:55 +0100 |
| |
>> How would you notice that a corresponding system test worked >> in reasonable ways? > > It needs a trust to the patch author or the tester who reported that > it worked.
Can this aspect vary over time?
> The test result should be mentioned concisely.
How do you think about to introduce accepted automatic test procedures?
> You shouldn't rely on my system.
Did this system get sufficient trust so far?
> The main point is your patch itself; make your patch more reliable.
It seems that I can make my adjustments only a bit more interesting by positive review comments from other contributors (if you can not become convinced by the concrete source code changes).
Regards, Markus
|  |