lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Nov]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: ALSA: nm256: Fine-tuning for three function implementations
On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 14:17:00 +0100,
SF Markus Elfring wrote:
>
> >> Which test results would you like to see or hear (!) from a real device
> >> (or a configuration in a virtual machine)?
> >
> > I don't mind either case as long as the test works.
>
> How would you notice that a corresponding system test worked
> in reasonable ways?

It needs a trust to the patch author or the tester who reported that
it worked. The test result should be mentioned concisely.

> >> I find such a development tool very relevant to reduce your concerns.
> >
> > It's about your patches, not my system.
>
> Your own automatic test system could provide a bit of
> more confidence for some change possibilities, couldn't it?

You shouldn't rely on my system. The main point is your patch itself;
make your patch more reliable.


Takashi

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-11-28 14:38    [W:0.076 / U:5.756 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site