lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Nov]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH 2/3] ocfs2: add ocfs2_overwrite_io function
From
Date


On 17/11/28 15:24, Gang He wrote:
> Hello Joseph,
>
>
>>>>
>
>>
>> On 17/11/28 11:35, Gang He wrote:
>>> Hello Joseph,
>>>
>>>
>>>>>>
>>>> Hi Gang,
>>>>
>>>> On 17/11/27 17:46, Gang He wrote:
>>>>> Add ocfs2_overwrite_io function, which is used to judge if
>>>>> overwrite allocated blocks, otherwise, the write will bring extra
>>>>> block allocation overhead.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Gang He <ghe@suse.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> fs/ocfs2/extent_map.c | 67
>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>> fs/ocfs2/extent_map.h | 3 +++
>>>>> 2 files changed, 70 insertions(+)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/extent_map.c b/fs/ocfs2/extent_map.c
>>>>> index e4719e0..98bf325 100644
>>>>> --- a/fs/ocfs2/extent_map.c
>>>>> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/extent_map.c
>>>>> @@ -832,6 +832,73 @@ int ocfs2_fiemap(struct inode *inode, struct
>>>> fiemap_extent_info *fieinfo,
>>>>> return ret;
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> +/* Is IO overwriting allocated blocks? */
>>>>> +int ocfs2_overwrite_io(struct inode *inode, u64 map_start, u64 map_len,
>>>>> + int wait)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + int ret = 0, is_last;
>>>>> + u32 mapping_end, cpos;
>>>>> + struct ocfs2_super *osb = OCFS2_SB(inode->i_sb);
>>>>> + struct buffer_head *di_bh = NULL;
>>>>> + struct ocfs2_extent_rec rec;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + if (wait)
>>>>> + ret = ocfs2_inode_lock(inode, &di_bh, 0);
>>>>> + else
>>>>> + ret = ocfs2_try_inode_lock(inode, &di_bh, 0);
>>>>> + if (ret)
>>>>> + goto out;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + if (wait)
>>>>> + down_read(&OCFS2_I(inode)->ip_alloc_sem);
>>>>> + else {
>>>>> + if (!down_read_trylock(&OCFS2_I(inode)->ip_alloc_sem)) {
>>>>> + ret = -EAGAIN;
>>>>> + goto out_unlock1;
>>>>> + }
>>>>> + }
>>>>> +
>>>>> + if ((OCFS2_I(inode)->ip_dyn_features & OCFS2_INLINE_DATA_FL) &&
>>>>> + ((map_start + map_len) <= i_size_read(inode)))
>>>>> + goto out_unlock2;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + cpos = map_start >> osb->s_clustersize_bits;
>>>>> + mapping_end = ocfs2_clusters_for_bytes(inode->i_sb,
>>>>> + map_start + map_len);
>>>>> + is_last = 0;
>>>>> + while (cpos < mapping_end && !is_last) {
>>>>> + ret = ocfs2_get_clusters_nocache(inode, di_bh, cpos,
>>>>> + NULL, &rec, &is_last);
>>>>> + if (ret) {
>>>>> + mlog_errno(ret);
>>>>> + goto out_unlock2;
>>>>> + }
>>>>> +
>>>>> + if (rec.e_blkno == 0ULL)
>>>>> + break;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + if (rec.e_flags & OCFS2_EXT_REFCOUNTED)
>>>>> + break;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + cpos = le32_to_cpu(rec.e_cpos) +
>>>>> + le16_to_cpu(rec.e_leaf_clusters);
>>>>> + }
>>>>> +
>>>>> + if (cpos < mapping_end)
>>>>> + ret = 1;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +out_unlock2:
>>>>> + brelse(di_bh);
>>>>> +
>>>>> + up_read(&OCFS2_I(inode)->ip_alloc_sem);
>>>>> +
>>>>> +out_unlock1:
>>>> Should brelse(di_bh) be here?
>>> If the code jumps to out_unlock1 directly, the di_bh pointer should be NULL,
>> it is not necessary to release.
>>>
>> Umm... No, once going out here, we have already taken inode lock. So
>> di_bh should be released.
> Sorry, you are right.
>
>>
>>>>
>>>>> + ocfs2_inode_unlock(inode, 0);
>>>>> +
>>>>> +out:
>>>>> + return (ret ? 0 : 1);
>>>> I don't think EAGAIN and other error code can be handled the same. We
>>>> have to distinguish them.
>>> Ok, I think we can add one line log to report the error in case the error is
>> not EAGAIN.
>>>
>> My point is, there is no need to try again in several cases, e.g. EROFS
>> returned by ocfs2_get_clusters_nocache.
> In this function ocfs2_overwrite_io() only can return True(1) or False(0), then I think we can only give a error print before return true/false.
> It is not necessary to return another value, but should let the user know any possible error message.
>This is because you just ignore the error and convert it to 0 or 1.
But in your next patch, if !ocfs2_overwrite_io(), it will return EGAIN
to upper layer and let it try again.
But in some cases, e.g. EROFS, trying again is meaningless. That's why
we can't simply return 0 or 1 here. Also we have to distinguish the
error code in the next patch.

> Thanks
> Gang
>
>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Joseph
>>>>
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +
>>>>> int ocfs2_seek_data_hole_offset(struct file *file, loff_t *offset, int
>>>> whence)
>>>>> {
>>>>> struct inode *inode = file->f_mapping->host;
>>>>> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/extent_map.h b/fs/ocfs2/extent_map.h
>>>>> index 67ea57d..fd9e86a 100644
>>>>> --- a/fs/ocfs2/extent_map.h
>>>>> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/extent_map.h
>>>>> @@ -53,6 +53,9 @@ int ocfs2_extent_map_get_blocks(struct inode *inode, u64
>>>> v_blkno, u64 *p_blkno,
>>>>> int ocfs2_fiemap(struct inode *inode, struct fiemap_extent_info *fieinfo,
>>>>> u64 map_start, u64 map_len);
>>>>>
>>>>> +int ocfs2_overwrite_io(struct inode *inode, u64 map_start, u64 map_len,
>>>>> + int wait);
>>>>> +
>>>>> int ocfs2_seek_data_hole_offset(struct file *file, loff_t *offset, int
>>>> origin);
>>>>>
>>>>> int ocfs2_xattr_get_clusters(struct inode *inode, u32 v_cluster,
>>>>>
>>>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-11-28 09:40    [W:0.054 / U:15.472 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site