lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Nov]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: ALSA: nm256: Fine-tuning for three function implementations
On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 17:40:18 +0100,
SF Markus Elfring wrote:
>
> > No-testing is the worst case.
>
> Free software development can occasionally mean that system tests
> can also be performed by a person who is different from the
> initial programmer.

So ask someone for testing. If you can find them and confirm that the
patch works, I'll happily apply. If not, it goes nowhere.

> >> * How do you think about to sort the remaining update candidates
> >> by their change size (or software age)?
> >
> > Irrelevant.
>
> Do you want that I point any other patch out which you could find
> easier to handle again?

Only if they got tested and/or got reviewed by others.


Takashi

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-11-28 17:46    [W:0.074 / U:5.788 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site