lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Nov]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH 03/21] x86/timer: Don't inline __const_udelay
Date
From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>

__const_udelay is marked inline, and LTO will happily inline it everywhere
Dropping the inline saves ~44k text in a LTO build.

13999560 1740864 1499136 17239560 1070e08 vmlinux-with-udelay-inline
13954764 1736768 1499136 17190668 1064f0c vmlinux-wo-udelay-inline

Even without LTO I believe marking it noinline documents it correctly.

Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
---
arch/x86/lib/delay.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/delay.c b/arch/x86/lib/delay.c
index 553f8fd23cc4..09c83b2f80d2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/lib/delay.c
+++ b/arch/x86/lib/delay.c
@@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ void __delay(unsigned long loops)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__delay);

-inline void __const_udelay(unsigned long xloops)
+void __const_udelay(unsigned long xloops)
{
unsigned long lpj = this_cpu_read(cpu_info.loops_per_jiffy) ? : loops_per_jiffy;
int d0;
--
2.13.6
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-11-27 22:37    [W:0.129 / U:2.068 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site