[lkml]   [2017]   [Nov]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 2/4] tpm: ignore burstcount to improve tpm_tis send() performance
On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 08:17:42PM +0530, Nayna Jain wrote:
> Yeah, you are right, the first version of this patch sent all the
> bytes together, but after hearing ddwg inputs, i.e. "The last byte was
> introduced for error checking purposes (history).", I reverted back to
> original to be safe.

What does that mean ie error checking purposes?

> It seems that the last byte was sent from the beginning (27084ef
> [PATCH] tpm: driver for next generation TPM chips,), does anyone
> remember the reason ?

Sent from the beginning?


 \ /
  Last update: 2017-11-26 16:23    [W:0.101 / U:1.344 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site