Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 26 Nov 2017 17:22:18 +0200 | From | Jarkko Sakkinen <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] tpm: ignore burstcount to improve tpm_tis send() performance |
| |
On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 08:17:42PM +0530, Nayna Jain wrote: > Yeah, you are right, the first version of this patch sent all the > bytes together, but after hearing ddwg inputs, i.e. "The last byte was > introduced for error checking purposes (history).", I reverted back to > original to be safe.
What does that mean ie error checking purposes?
> It seems that the last byte was sent from the beginning (27084ef > [PATCH] tpm: driver for next generation TPM chips,), does anyone > remember the reason ?
Sent from the beginning?
/Jarkko
| |