[lkml]   [2017]   [Nov]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: FW: [RFC PATCH] tpm: don't return -EINVAL if TPM command validation fails
On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 08:25:29PM +0100, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> That was my interpretation as well and what I was arguing about. I'm glad to
> know that you also think the same.

It could be that this rationale has been your earlier emails but
I just haven't recognized it :-) I think I'm starting to buy this.

I don't have any fixed standing points anything basically. It is
just better to be really resistant with anything that is related
to user-kernel interaction until you really get it...


 \ /
  Last update: 2017-11-26 15:21    [W:0.085 / U:6.472 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site