lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Nov]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: regression: 4.13 cannot follow symlinks on some ext3 fs
Date
On Nov 24, 2017, at 9:51 AM, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote:
>
>> We checked old kernels, and old e2fsprogs, and didn't see any cases
>> where fast (<= 60 chars) symlinks were created using external blocks.
>> It seems that _something_ did create them, and it would be good to
>> figure that out so we can determine if it is a widespread problem
>
> I assume it was the original kernel.
>
>>
>> I think e2fsck can fix this quite easily, and there really isn't
>> an easy way to revert to the old method if the large xattr feature
>> is enabled. If you are willing to run a new kernel, you should also
>> be willing to run a new e2fsck.
>
> It's obviously not enabled on ext3.
>
>> We could probably add a fallback to the old mechanism (and print
>> a one-time warning to upgrade to a newer e2fsck) if an external fast
>> symlink is found and the large xattr feature is not enabled, which
>> would give more time to fix this (hopefully rare in the wild) case.
>
> If the old kernel created it, then likely all the
> /lib{,64}/ld-linux.so.2 symlinks have that, which breaks all ELF
> executables. I suspect in these old file systems it's not particularly rare.

Sure, but not many people are going to be running a 4.14 kernel with
a 2007 system. Could you please run the updated find command to see
whether this is an isolated case, or if it is a common case:

find / -type l -size -60c -print0 | xargs -0r ls -dils | awk '$2 != 0 { print }'

It would also be useful if anyone else reading this that has an old
system (2005-2011 install date) ran the same to see if any such
symlinks are found. To see when the root filesystem was created, run:

dumpe2fs -h $(df -P / | awk '/dev/ { print $1 }') 2>&1 | grep created

> So I don't think you can just break them all.

Sure. As previously mentioned, it shouldn't have broken *any* systems
based on our prior investigation, I'm just trying to see how bad the
problem really is. Like I said, a workaround (without need to patch
the kernel, and that is compatible with old and new kernels) is:

find / -type l -size -60c -print0 | xargs -0r ls -dils | awk '$2 != 0 { print }' |
while read L; do ln -sfv "$(ls -l "$L" | sed -e 's/.*-> //')" "$L"; done

This just recreates any problematic symlinks in place, which should make
it a proper fast symlink.

> I think it's ok to only handle it when the large xattrs are disabled.
>
> Requiring new e2fsck on old systems is a bad idea.

Any worse an idea than running a new kernel on an old system?
Newer e2fsck fixes a lot of bugs that are present in older
e2fsck as well...

Cheers, Andreas





[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-11-24 23:04    [W:0.112 / U:1.796 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site