[lkml]   [2017]   [Nov]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 05/10] x86: jailhouse: Set up timekeeping
On 2017-11-23 19:36, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Nov 2017, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2017-11-20 12:24, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>> On Sat, 18 Nov 2017, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>> On 2017-11-17 23:49, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 16 Nov 2017, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>>>> Calibrate the TSC and, where necessary, the APIC timer against the
>>>>>> TMTIMER. We need our own implementation as neither the PIC nor the HPET
>>>>>> are available, and the standard calibration routines try to make use of
>>>>>> them.
>>>>> Why is this needed at all?
>>>>> The host the frequency already. So this can be done w/o pmtimer and extra
>>>>> calibration routine.
>>>> The hypervisor does not have the frequencies. It will never use the APIC
>>>> timer (it's owned by the guests), and it has no use case for the TSC so
>>>> far. Only the root cell (the Linux that booted the system) has that
>>>> data. Now we could
>>>> - trust the root cell to provide the right values and export them during
>>>> startup to the hypervisor and from there to the non-root cells.
>>>> - calculate the frequencies once and store them in the hyperivsor
>>>> config, just like other system-specific information, for re-export to
>>>> the cells.
>>>> But I don't think option 1 will be ok for all use cases. Maybe a
>>>> combination of both, falling back to the root cell data if nothing is
>>>> defined in the config. Let me think about this.
>>> Another question is whether systems which can support jailhouse, have the
>>> frequencies available via cpuid/msr and can avoid that calibration thing
>>> completely.
>> OK, some may (not Xeons, though), and we would not exploit it with this
>> approach.
> Ok. Let's expose pmtimer it's not a big issue.

I think PM timer should to be exposed independently of the question
wheather calibrate or not. If - for whatever reason - TSC is/becomes
unstable, we should have a fallback clock.

I've started to hack on forwarding calibration results from (primary)
Linux to the other guests with the option to alternatively hard-code the
values in the configuration. Seems to work find, just requires to export
lapic_timer_frequency. I'll push updates the next days that exploit this
and simplifies this patch.


 \ /
  Last update: 2017-11-23 20:50    [W:0.049 / U:9.520 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site