[lkml]   [2017]   [Nov]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: hugetlb page migration vs. overcommit
On Wed 22-11-17 11:11:38, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> On 11/22/2017 07:28 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > Why don't we simply migrate as long as we are able to allocate the
> > target hugetlb page? I have a half baked patch to remove this
> > restriction, would there be an opposition to do something like that?
> I would not be opposed and would help with this effort. My concern would
> be any subtle hugetlb accounting issues once you start messing with
> additional overcommit pages.

Well my current (crude) patch checks for overcommit in the destructor
and releases the page if we are over. That should deal with accounting
Michal Hocko

 \ /
  Last update: 2017-11-23 10:22    [W:0.150 / U:4.708 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site