lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Nov]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 4/4] cpu_cooling: Drop static-power related stuff
From
Date
On 21/11/2017 19:00, Javi Merino wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 08:57:06AM -0800, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>> As I said before, the minimal you guys (ARM and Linaro) can do is to at
>> least upstream the Juno code! as a reference. Come on guys? what is
>> preventing you to upstream Juno model?
>
> As Ionela pointed out earlier in the thread, the cpufreq driver for Juno
> was not acceptable for mainline because it used platform specific code.
> When it was converted to cpufreq-dt, the static power was left behind
> because it can't be represented in device tree. This is because there
> isn't a function that works for every SoC, different process nodes
> (among other things) will need different functions. So it can't be just
> a bunch of coefficients in DT, we need a function. Hence the callback.

The DT could contain the coef and a compatible string for a specific
polynomial computation callback. I imagine we should not have a lot of
different equations, no ?



--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-11-21 19:06    [W:0.097 / U:16.784 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site