[lkml]   [2017]   [Nov]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH] tpm: don't return -EINVAL if TPM command validation fails
On 11/21/2017 10:07 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> On 11/21/2017 12:15 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
>> matters less than breaking the sandbox.
> Yes, sorry for that. It wasn't clear to me that there was a sandbox and my
> lack of familiarity with the code was the reason why I posted as a RFC in
> the first place.
> Do you agree with Jason's suggestion to send a synthesized TPM command in
> the that the command isn't supported?

Sorry, this should had been: send a synthesized TPM response in the case that
the command isn't supported.

Best regards,
Javier Martinez Canillas
Software Engineer - Desktop Hardware Enablement
Red Hat

 \ /
  Last update: 2017-11-21 10:28    [W:0.126 / U:0.568 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site