lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Nov]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 5/9] drivers: base: cacheinfo: arm64: Add support for ACPI based firmware tables
On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 03:03:07PM -0600, Jeremy Linton wrote:
> The /sys cache entries should support ACPI/PPTT generated cache
> topology information. Lets detect ACPI systems and call
> an arch specific cache_setup_acpi() routine to update the hardware
> probed cache topology.
>
> For arm64, if ACPI is enabled, determine the max number of cache
> levels and populate them using a PPTT table if one is available.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kernel/cacheinfo.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++-----
> drivers/acpi/pptt.c | 1 +
> drivers/base/cacheinfo.c | 17 +++++++++++------
> include/linux/cacheinfo.h | 11 +++++++++--
> 4 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cacheinfo.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cacheinfo.c
> index 380f2e2fbed5..2e2cf0d312ba 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cacheinfo.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cacheinfo.c
> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
> * along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
> */
>
> +#include <linux/acpi.h>
> #include <linux/cacheinfo.h>
> #include <linux/of.h>
>
> @@ -44,9 +45,17 @@ static void ci_leaf_init(struct cacheinfo *this_leaf,
> this_leaf->type = type;
> }
>
> +#ifndef CONFIG_ACPI
> +int acpi_find_last_cache_level(unsigned int cpu)
> +{
> + /*ACPI kernels should be built with PPTT support*/
> + return 0;
> +}
> +#endif
> +

Why can't this be in generic acpi header

#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_PPTT
int acpi_find_last_cache_level(unsigned int cpu)
#else
static int acpi_find_last_cache_level(unsigned int cpu) { return 0; }
#endif

or something similar to of_find_last_cache_level. I don't see why this
has to be ARM64 specific.

> static int __init_cache_level(unsigned int cpu)
> {
> - unsigned int ctype, level, leaves, of_level;
> + unsigned int ctype, level, leaves, fw_level;
> struct cpu_cacheinfo *this_cpu_ci = get_cpu_cacheinfo(cpu);
>
> for (level = 1, leaves = 0; level <= MAX_CACHE_LEVEL; level++) {
> @@ -59,15 +68,19 @@ static int __init_cache_level(unsigned int cpu)
> leaves += (ctype == CACHE_TYPE_SEPARATE) ? 2 : 1;
> }
>
> - of_level = of_find_last_cache_level(cpu);
> - if (level < of_level) {
> + if (acpi_disabled)
> + fw_level = of_find_last_cache_level(cpu);
> + else
> + fw_level = acpi_find_last_cache_level(cpu);
> +
> + if (level < fw_level) {
> /*
> * some external caches not specified in CLIDR_EL1
> * the information may be available in the device tree
> * only unified external caches are considered here
> */
> - leaves += (of_level - level);
> - level = of_level;
> + leaves += (fw_level - level);
> + level = fw_level;
> }
>
> this_cpu_ci->num_levels = level;

Better to keep any arm64 related changes in a separate patch.

> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pptt.c b/drivers/acpi/pptt.c
> index 9c9b8b4660e0..aa259502c4eb 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/pptt.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pptt.c
> @@ -324,6 +324,7 @@ static void update_cache_properties(struct cacheinfo *this_leaf,
> struct acpi_pptt_cache *found_cache,
> struct acpi_pptt_processor *cpu_node)
> {
> + this_leaf->firmware_node = cpu_node;
> if (found_cache->flags & ACPI_PPTT_SIZE_PROPERTY_VALID)
> this_leaf->size = found_cache->size;
> if (found_cache->flags & ACPI_PPTT_LINE_SIZE_VALID)
> diff --git a/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c b/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c
> index eb3af2739537..8eca279e50d1 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c
> @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ static int cache_setup_of_node(unsigned int cpu)
> static inline bool cache_leaves_are_shared(struct cacheinfo *this_leaf,
> struct cacheinfo *sib_leaf)
> {
> - return sib_leaf->of_node == this_leaf->of_node;
> + return sib_leaf->firmware_node == this_leaf->firmware_node;
> }
>

I am thinking it's better to even separate the DT and ACPI PPTT related
changes. First refactor DT code renaming or adding new cacheinfo elements.
Then add ACPI PPTT related changes. It helps to keep changes small at a
time and easy for bisection in case of any issues.

> /* OF properties to query for a given cache type */
> @@ -215,6 +215,11 @@ static inline bool cache_leaves_are_shared(struct cacheinfo *this_leaf,
> }
> #endif
>
> +int __weak cache_setup_acpi(unsigned int cpu)
> +{
> + return -ENOTSUPP;
> +}
> +
> static int cache_shared_cpu_map_setup(unsigned int cpu)
> {
> struct cpu_cacheinfo *this_cpu_ci = get_cpu_cacheinfo(cpu);
> @@ -225,11 +230,11 @@ static int cache_shared_cpu_map_setup(unsigned int cpu)
> if (this_cpu_ci->cpu_map_populated)
> return 0;
>
> - if (of_have_populated_dt())
> + if (!acpi_disabled)
> + ret = cache_setup_acpi(cpu);
> + else if (of_have_populated_dt())
> ret = cache_setup_of_node(cpu);
> - else if (!acpi_disabled)
> - /* No cache property/hierarchy support yet in ACPI */
> - ret = -ENOTSUPP;
> +
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> @@ -286,7 +291,7 @@ static void cache_shared_cpu_map_remove(unsigned int cpu)
>
> static void cache_override_properties(unsigned int cpu)
> {
> - if (of_have_populated_dt())
> + if (acpi_disabled && of_have_populated_dt())
> return cache_of_override_properties(cpu);
> }
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/cacheinfo.h b/include/linux/cacheinfo.h
> index 6a524bf6a06d..d1e9b8e01981 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cacheinfo.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cacheinfo.h
> @@ -36,6 +36,9 @@ enum cache_type {
> * @of_node: if devicetree is used, this represents either the cpu node in
> * case there's no explicit cache node or the cache node itself in the
> * device tree
> + * @firmware_node: Shared with of_node. When not using DT, this may contain
> + * pointers to other firmware based values. Particularly ACPI/PPTT
> + * unique values.
> * @disable_sysfs: indicates whether this node is visible to the user via
> * sysfs or not
> * @priv: pointer to any private data structure specific to particular
> @@ -64,8 +67,10 @@ struct cacheinfo {
> #define CACHE_ALLOCATE_POLICY_MASK \
> (CACHE_READ_ALLOCATE | CACHE_WRITE_ALLOCATE)
> #define CACHE_ID BIT(4)
> -
> - struct device_node *of_node;
> + union {
> + struct device_node *of_node;
> + void *firmware_node;
> + };

I would prefer
struct device_node *of_node;
changed to
struct fwnode_handle *fwnode;

You can then have
struct pptt_fwnode {
<.....>
/*below fwnode allocated using acpi_alloc_fwnode_static */
struct fwnode_handle *fwnode;
};

This gives a good starting point to abstract DT and ACPI.

If not now, we can later implement fwnode.ops=pptt_cache_ops and then
use get property for both DT and ACPI.

--
Regards,
Sudeep

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-11-20 17:58    [W:0.103 / U:1.712 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site