lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Nov]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: save/restore cpu cycle counter in cpu_pm_pmu_notify
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 09:50:15PM +0800, Jia He wrote:
> On 11/20/2017 8:32 PM, Mark Rutland Wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 06:27:28AM +0000, Jia He wrote:
> > > Sometimes userspace need a high resolution cycle counter by reading
> > > pmccntr_el0.
> > >
> > > In commit da4e4f18afe0 ("drivers/perf: arm_pmu: implement CPU_PM
> > > notifier"), it resets all the counters even when the pmcr_el0.E and
> > > pmcntenset_el0.C are both 1 . That is incorrect.
> > I appreciate that you may wish to make use of the cycle counter from
> > userspace, but this is the intended behaviour kernel-side. Direct
> > userspace counter acceess is not supported.
> Sorry for my previous description. Not only user space, but also any
> pmccntr_el0 reading
> in kernel space is 0 except perf infrastructure.

The only user of PMCCNTR in the kernel is the perf infrastructure.

If you want to perform in-kernel counts, please use
perf_event_create_kernel_counter() and related functions.

> > In power states where context is lost, any perf events are
> > saved/restored by cpu_pm_pmu_setup(). So we certainly shouldn't be
> > modifying the counter registers in any other PM code.
> >
> > We *could* expose counters to userspace on homogeneous systems, so long
> > as users stuck to the usual perf data page interface. However, this
> > comes with a number of subtle problems, and no-one's done the work to
> > enable this.
> >
> > Even then, perf may modify counters at any point in time, and
> > monotonicity (and/or presence) of counters is not guaranteed.
>
> Yes, the cycle counter register pmccntr_el0 will be impacted by perf
> usage.But do you think pmccntr_el0 is intented for perf only?

We only intend for the in-kernel perf infrastructure to access
pmccntr_el0; nothing else should touch it.

> Currently, many user space/kernel space programs will use pmccntr_el0
> as a timestamp( just likethe rdtsc() on X86).

This is not supported, and will return completely unusable numbers if
it were. This will be randomly reset/modified, CPUs aren't in lock-step,
so this isn't monotonic, etc.

If you want a timestamp, the architecture provides an counter that is
monotonic and uniform across all CPUs. We expose that to userspace via
the VDSO (e.g. clock_gettime with CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW) and it can be
read in-kernel through the usual clocksource APIs.

PMCCNTR is *not* usable in this manner.

> After commit da4e4f18afe0, all the cycle counter readingis 0 because
> of CPU PM enter/exit state changes in armv8pmu_reset.

Previously, had a CPU been reset, the counter would hold an UNKNOWN
value (i.e. it would be reset to junk), and may or may not have been
accessible depending on what CNTKCTL reset to.

So if you tried to read PMCCNTR in userspace, and happened to have been
granted access, the values would have been bogus and unusable.

Commit da4e4f18afe0 fixed things and made the behaviour consistent, as
intended.

Thanks,
Mark.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-11-20 15:05    [W:0.038 / U:6.916 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site