Messages in this thread |  | | Subject | Re: A test of the philosophical impact.. Behaviour problems of "Gnu-Zealots" = Illegal Unix Rip. | From | Ywe Cærlyn <> | Date | Sat, 18 Nov 2017 16:56:56 +0100 |
| |
Den 11/12/2017 11:53, skrev Ywe Cærlyn: > Den 11/9/2017 11:55, skrev Ywe Cærlyn: >> Den 11/6/2017 19:13, skrev Ywe Cærlyn: >>> Den 11/6/2017 11:00, skrev Ywe Cærlyn: >>>> Den 11/4/2017 23:53, skrev Ywe Cærlyn: >>>>> Den 11/3/2017 07:46, skrev Ywe Cærlyn: >>>>>> Den 10/29/2017 17:21, skrev Ywe Cærlyn: >>>>>>> Den 10/29/2017 17:00, skrev Ywe Cærlyn: >>>>>>>> Den 10/27/2017 23:28, skrev Ywe Cærlyn: >>>>>>>>> Den 10/27/2017 23:01, skrev Ywe Cærlyn: >>>>>>>>>> Philosophical requantization of a (atm) theoretical linux >>>>>>>>>> distribution: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Excellent Ubuntu, is a Good Linux, with a Minimal Jitter Kernel. >>>>>>>>>> An Available Source Operating System. >>>>>>>>>> Philosophical Lead: Ywe Cærlyn. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Desktop Flavour: Customized Gnome >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Finetuned for fast reponsiveness, and smoothness in >>>>>>>>>> operation. Configuration of Kernel, for favoring short >>>>>>>>>> buffers, lowest latency, minimal jitter, minimal wasted CPU, >>>>>>>>>> max cpu utilization. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Perfect scaling, from desktop to supercomputing. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Redefined Internet, with the finest philosophy, and correct >>>>>>>>>> attitude. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Call 999-Excellence for a trial CD... No that we don´t have >>>>>>>>>> yet, but how does it sound? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Peace, >>>>>>>>>> Ywe Cærlyn. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I have made a good logo >>>>>>>>> aswell:http://xn--ywecrlyn-m0a.net/ExcellentUbuntu/ExcellentUbuntu.png >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I really believe in this, and what makes this just perfect: >>>>>>>> Everyone is their own newsservice, getting their views on for >>>>>>>> instance, youtube. And gets the income from this. Which makes a >>>>>>>> finely granulated internet economy. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> A test channel: >>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCR3gmLVjHS5A702wo4bol_Q >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Peace, >>>>>>>> Ywe Cærlyn. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> With Linus Torvalds as patchmeister as usual, ofcourse. >>>>>>> >>>>>> So considering this, and the finely granulated internet economics >>>>>> comes from this type of mindset, and with reintergration of it >>>>>> back, I would suggest changing the naming scheme of "open >>>>>> source", and "free software" to "Available Source". It is >>>>>> repeated a lot, and needs to have a corresponding name. (To not >>>>>> speak of avoiding uneccesary pointer variables in GNU code... ). >>>>>> This is also based on on my conclusion on philosophy research >>>>>> over 15 years, and that things need to be right. And even >>>>>> metaphysically. For Success. I also CC Richard Stallman on this, >>>>>> maybe GNU4.0 will make considerations for this. The hacker will >>>>>> now not only be free, but make money. ;) >>>>>> >>>>>> Peace. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> Mister GNU Richard Stallman replied me two times on this, since he >>>>> did not mail LKML, I will restate them here, for the record. >>>>> >>>>> | >>>>> |[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please >>>>> consider ]]] >>>>> |[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all >>>>> enemies, ]]] >>>>> |[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's >>>>> example. ]]]| >>>>> | >>>>> |It seems that you're making a new variant of GNU/Linux. If you call >>>>> |it "something Linux", you are talking about our work but giving us >>>>> |none of the credit. Please call it "something GNU/Linux" so as to >>>>> |give us equal mention. >>>>> | >>>>> |See https://gnu.org/gnu/linux-and-gnu.html and >>>>> |https://gnu.org/gnu/gnu-linux-faq.html, plus the history in >>>>> |https://gnu.org/gnu/the-gnu-project.html. >>>>> | >>>>> |-- >>>>> |Dr Richard Stallman >>>>> |President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org) >>>>> |Internet Hall-of-Famer (internethalloffame.org) >>>>> |Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html. >>>>> | >>>>> And- >>>>> >>>>> | >>>>> |[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please >>>>> consider ]]] >>>>> |[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all >>>>> enemies, ]]] >>>>> |[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's >>>>> example. ]]] >>>>> | >>>>> |"Available source" is too weak a criterion. Free software and open >>>>> |source stand for categories of software that are nearly coterminous. >>>>> |However, available source is a much weaker criterion and would >>>>> |include programs that don't come anywhere near free. >>>>> | >>>>> |Also, the point of the free software movement is that users deserve >>>>> |freedom. "Available source" doesn't even hint at this idea, >>>>> |so it would not communicate what we want to say. >>>>> | >>>>> | >>>>> |-- >>>>> |Dr Richard Stallman >>>>> |President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org) >>>>> |Internet Hall-of-Famer (internethalloffame.org) >>>>> |Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html. >>>>> | >>>>> >>>>> Not even an acknowledgement on pointer variables from this >>>>> self-appointed spokesman for hackers. Or indeed the larger issue >>>>> of finegranulated internet economics. How shall an OS indeed >>>>> succeed if it chokes its own success? >>>>> >>>>> To not speak of the paranoid insertions. Does he fear mountains >>>>> shall fall on him, for GNU? Indeed GNU seems to be his qualifier >>>>> and god, he slaves to. >>>>> >>>>> Or is gnu, a god to slave to, free software your food, and Richard >>>>> Stallman its Jesusian son? Will it be up to others to make the >>>>> decision? >>>>> >>>>> How much is this in conflict with pure hacking, from C64 asm, to >>>>> PC C, and the original unix hacking? >>>>> >>>>> Have a Mindful Zen moment on this. >>>>> >>>> >>>> As for my own experience, check out my Biit channel where I am >>>> going to go through highlights, and do DSP retrofits, remasters etc. >>>> >>>> For instance this track: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xMfWsx3JBUg >>>> Uses my own developed absolute minimal psychacoustically corrected >>>> phase plateau band EQ. Here I am even using these EQs in serial and >>>> parallel on the mix, and on the master, without phaseartifacts. A >>>> further developement of the IIR-FIR discussion, into a solution >>>> with similar sound of input and output. >>>> >>>> Have you ever seen such a thing before? No?. Well I made that. >>>> >>>> I also did a custom theme for the app used there. Which will be the >>>> principles I will use in "Excellent Ubuntu" aswell. >>>> >>>> Peace. >>> >>> No list replies. Is this not interesting? I might actually move to >>> BSD. The BSD 3-clause licence might be more suitable for this. >>> >>> Something else I want is also a subpixel accurate, resolution >>> independent desktop compositor. Without tearing, when displaying >>> video or similar, and also when recording screen events. (games, >>> desktop etc.) Transparent mode changing when necessary, etc. And >>> minimal jitter programming. >>> >>> So bye for now. >>> >> Apple changes away from GNU to Apache for CUSP also. >> >> So obviously I am not alone in this, and the whole userbase of >> OpenBSD seems to be more like me. >> Seems to be something about the arguments of original unix code, and >> if GNU simply tries to be a rip of that. And really never invented >> that at all, and is an enemy of this. >> So if you are like me, then you probably should consider the same. >> "Unnud Oddox be with you". >> >> >> > It seems clear now, that the often criticised behaviour problems of > "GNU-Zealots" is due to the "GNU is not Unix" type ripping mentality > of Stallman. Ripping Unix was ofcourse illegal in its time. That is > ofcourse corrected with OpenBSD, a legal fork of Unix, and instead the > three clause BSD licence, which is without all the criticisms of GNU, > "Tivoization", and supposedly "legal" knowledge. > > I have now included a "no GNU-Zealots" type logo, which also can be > obtained from me, if wanted: > https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCR3gmLVjHS5A702wo4bol_Q > > And ofcourse on a larger scale, part of a better internet, an > Ultranet, a superweb, with clean news, and social netactivity. > > > Peaceful Saluations. > > > Btw, Stallmans own "LIbre"-tweak seems to be going in the same direction. However as long as GNU really is based on an illegal rip of Unix, where he is the frontman, a complete correction is really going to a legal fork of Unix, like OpenBSD. Or it still really is just as dodgy as Microsofts MS-DOS rip.
My about page is now up on ultranet. http://www.ultranet.life/author-info/
|  |