lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Nov]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] f2fs: let f2fs also gc atomic file to avoid loop gc
From
Date
Is there any problem if just deleting the judgement condition in this patch?

On 2017/11/8 17:28, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2017/11/8 10:34, Yunlong Song wrote:
>> If some files are opened with atomic flag and have not commited yet, at
>> the same time, if all the target victim segments have at least one page
>> of these atomic files, then f2fs gc will fail to do gc and hangs in the
>> process of go to gc_more, since gc_date_segment will not move any data
>> and get_valid_blocks will never be 0, then do_garbage_collect will
>> always return 0.
> Oh, I added this judgment condition to avoid ruining atomic write by data
> GC, could we find another way to solve this issue? BTW, if there is direct
> IO, we will also skip data segment GC.
>
> Thanks,
>
>> Signed-off-by: Yunlong Song <yunlong.song@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> fs/f2fs/gc.c | 6 ------
>> 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/gc.c b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
>> index 5d5bba4..3fdcd04 100644
>> --- a/fs/f2fs/gc.c
>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
>> @@ -621,9 +621,6 @@ static void move_data_block(struct inode *inode, block_t bidx,
>> if (!check_valid_map(F2FS_I_SB(inode), segno, off))
>> goto out;
>>
>> - if (f2fs_is_atomic_file(inode))
>> - goto out;
>> -
>> set_new_dnode(&dn, inode, NULL, NULL, 0);
>> err = get_dnode_of_data(&dn, bidx, LOOKUP_NODE);
>> if (err)
>> @@ -718,9 +715,6 @@ static void move_data_page(struct inode *inode, block_t bidx, int gc_type,
>> if (!check_valid_map(F2FS_I_SB(inode), segno, off))
>> goto out;
>>
>> - if (f2fs_is_atomic_file(inode))
>> - goto out;
>> -
>> if (gc_type == BG_GC) {
>> if (PageWriteback(page))
>> goto out;
>>
>
> .
>

--
Thanks,
Yunlong Song


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-11-17 17:18    [W:0.092 / U:1.432 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site