lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Nov]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/8] USB: add device-tree support for interfaces
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 08:43:21AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 06:07:15PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > This series adds support for representing USB interfaces in device tree
> > by implementing support for "interface nodes" and "combined nodes" from
> > the OF specification.
> >
> > This is needed to be able to describe non-discoverable properties of
> > permanently attached USB devices and their interfaces such as any
> > i2c-clients connected to a USB-i2c bridge (e.g. the dln2 mfd) or,
> > eventually, devices connected to usb-serial converters (to be used with
> > serdev).
>
> In the original OF binding, the firmware dynamically generated the tree
> for the active configuration AIUI. That doesn't really fit for the
> (mostly) static FDT usage and why we stopped at the device level. So how
> do we handle multiple configs? Or can we assume that if say the I2C bus
> is used, then there's only one config and interface that can use it?

Multiple configuration can be used to implement different sets of
functionality. A hypothetical device could have one i2c controller in
one configuration and two in another. Most devices will only have one
configuration though.

A USB interface implements some functionality of the device (and this is
what Linux USB drivers bind to). So even for single-configuration
devices, you need to be able to say which i2c controller (bus) you are
describing.

[ And as a simplification, the combined nodes can be used for most cases
were we only have one configuration with a single interface. ]

Note that a new set of interfaces (in the kernel device model) is
created when a new USB device configuration is selected. These new
interfaces will be associated with any matching device-tree interface
nodes and that these would be distinct from any nodes that matches
another configuration.

So I don't think there's any problem with dealing with the rare cases of
multi-configuration devices.

Johan
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-11-17 17:17    [W:0.284 / U:0.056 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site