lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Nov]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [Regression/XFS/PM] Freeze tasks failed in xfsaild
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 7:01 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 12:40:43AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Wednesday, November 15, 2017 12:07:30 AM CET Dave Chinner wrote:
>> Can we stop here and be constructive going forward, please?
>
> Then let's stop this nonsense and get to work.
>
>> > > So what do you think should be done, specifically?
>> >
>> > Luis posted an initial version of those "use fs freeze" changes
>> > recently, so Work with Luis to get those changes into the kernel.
>>
>> This isn't the first version as per the above and sorry, but without
>> help from fs people this is going to end the same way as before and
>> I sort of doubt that "working with Luis" alone is going to be sufficient.
>>
>> We need the fs people to actually help us, pretty much like back in 2011.
>
> Rafael, AFAICT the only outstanding issue with the patches I posted were
> the last two patches. I haven't had time to re-test my patches without the
> last patch, but if Chinner was right, and I suspect he was, then the last patch
> is what implicated the need for the ext patch, which we don't want. So dropping
> the last two patches I think would be a good starting point.
>
> I hope to have time to re-test this week, if you feel compelled to help,
> you can also help test the patches except for the last two. Then if you
> want to help further, helping iron out the kinks on the last patch would
> be much appreciated.

OK, please resend the series when you're ready.

Thanks,
Rafael

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-11-15 19:06    [W:0.067 / U:0.344 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site