Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 14 Nov 2017 19:48:00 +0300 | From | Vitaly Lipatov <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2] fs/fcntl: restore checking against COMPAT_LOFF_T_MAX for F_GETLK64 |
| |
Jeff Layton писал 14.11.17 17:06: ... >> break; >> - err = fixup_compat_flock(&flock); >> + err = fixup_compat_flock(&flock, COMPAT_OFF_T_MAX); > > I think you want COMPAT_LOFF_T_MAX here? In any case, I'm fine with the > first version, and just renaming the function. I'll plan to push that > one unless you have a reason that we should do it this way. I would like send v3 with fix the typo you told me. As for me, it is more clean than two functions. Was I wrong with MessageId last time or it is ok to have a new thread for every patch version?
-- С уважением, Виталий Липатов, Etersoft
| |