[lkml]   [2017]   [Nov]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: staging: pi433: Possible bug in rf69.c
On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 06:23:32PM +0100, Marcus Wolf wrote:
> Hi everybody!
> Just comparing the master of Gregs statging of pi433 with my local SVN
> to review all changes, that were done the last monthes.
> I am not sure, but maybe we imported a bug in rf69.c lines 378 and
> following:
> Gregs repo:
> case automatic: return WRITE_REG(REG_LNA, ( (READ_REG(REG_LNA) & ~MASK_LNA_GAIN) & LNA_GAIN_AUTO) );
> my repo:
> case automatic: return WRITE_REG(REG_LNA, ( (READ_REG(REG_LNA) & ~MASK_LNA_GAIN) | LNA_GAIN_AUTO) );

I edited the lines for clarity. The difference is that your repo does
a bitwise OR "| LNA_GAIN_AUTO" and the code does a bitwise

The kernel repo hasn't changed since you sent us the driver in commit
874bcba65f9a ('staging: pi433: New driver'). I agree that & doesn't
seem to make sense and I'm disapointed that it doesn't cause a Smatch

But LNA_GAIN_AUTO is zero so maybe | BIT(LNA_GAIN_AUTO) was intended
instead of | LNA_GAIN_AUTO. I don't know... No one on this list knows
the answer probably. :/

dan caprenter

 \ /
  Last update: 2017-11-10 20:34    [W:0.067 / U:7.520 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site