Messages in this thread - First message in thread
- "Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin)"
- "Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin)"
- "Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin)"
- "Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin)"
- "Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin)"
- "Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin)"
- "Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin)"
- "Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin)"
- "Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin)"
- "Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin)"
- "Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin)"
- "Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin)"
- "Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin)"
- "Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin)"
- "Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin)"
- "Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin)"
- "Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin)"
- "Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin)"
- "Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin)"
- "Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin)"
- "Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin)"
- "Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin)"
- "Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin)"
- "Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin)"
- "Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin)"
- "Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin)"
- "Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin)"
- "Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin)"
- "Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin)"
- "Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin)"
- "Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin)"
- "Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin)"
- "Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin)"
- "Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin)"
- "Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin)"
- "Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin)"
- "Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin)"
- "Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin)"
- "Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin)"
- "Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin)"
- "Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin)"
- "Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin)"
- "Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin)"
- "Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin)"
- "Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin)"
- "Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin)"
- "Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin)"
Patch in this message | | | From | "Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin)" <> | Subject | [PATCH review for 4.9 05/50] PM / wakeirq: report a wakeup_event on dedicated wekup irq | Date | Sat, 7 Oct 2017 22:36:47 +0000 |
| |
From: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
[ Upstream commit 09bb6e93956ae5175b96905b723ec879c3ca0765 ]
There are two reasons for reporting wakeup event when dedicated wakeup IRQ is triggered:
- wakeup events accounting, so proper statistical data will be displayed in sysfs and debugfs;
- there are small window when System is entering suspend during which dedicated wakeup IRQ can be lost:
dpm_suspend_noirq() |- device_wakeup_arm_wake_irqs() |- dev_pm_arm_wake_irq(X) |- IRQ is enabled and marked as wakeup source [1]... |- suspend_device_irqs() |- suspend_device_irq(X) |- irqd_set(X, IRQD_WAKEUP_ARMED); |- wakup IRQ armed
The wakeup IRQ can be lost if it's triggered at point [1] and not armed yet.
Hence, fix above cases by adding simple pm_wakeup_event() call in handle_threaded_wake_irq().
Fixes: 4990d4fe327b (PM / Wakeirq: Add automated device wake IRQ handling) Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com> [ tony@atomide.com: added missing return to avoid warnings ] Tested-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@verizon.com> --- drivers/base/power/wakeirq.c | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/base/power/wakeirq.c b/drivers/base/power/wakeirq.c index 404d94c6c8bc..feba1b211898 100644 --- a/drivers/base/power/wakeirq.c +++ b/drivers/base/power/wakeirq.c @@ -141,6 +141,13 @@ static irqreturn_t handle_threaded_wake_irq(int irq, void *_wirq) struct wake_irq *wirq = _wirq; int res; + /* Maybe abort suspend? */ + if (irqd_is_wakeup_set(irq_get_irq_data(irq))) { + pm_wakeup_event(wirq->dev, 0); + + return IRQ_HANDLED; + } + /* We don't want RPM_ASYNC or RPM_NOWAIT here */ res = pm_runtime_resume(wirq->dev); if (res < 0) -- 2.11.0
| |