lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Oct]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: add device tree binding for Allwinner XR819 SDIO Wi-Fi
On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 10:02:48AM +0000, Arend van Spriel wrote:
> On 10/4/2017 11:03 AM, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> >
> >
> > 于 2017年10月4日 GMT+08:00 下午5:02:17, Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> 写到:
> > > Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@aosc.io> writes:
> > >
> > > > Allwinner XR819 is a SDIO Wi-Fi chip, which has the functionality to
> > > use
> > > > an out-of-band interrupt pin instead of SDIO in-band interrupt.
> > > >
> > > > Add the device tree binding of this chip, in order to make it
> > > possible
> > > > to add this interrupt pin to device trees.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@aosc.io>
> > > > Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> > > > ---
> > > > Changes in v3:
> > > > - Renames the node name.
> > > > - Adds ACK from Rob.
> > > > Changes in v2:
> > > > - Removed status property in example.
> > > > - Added required property reg.
> > > >
> > > > .../bindings/net/wireless/allwinner,xr819.txt | 38
> > > ++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+)
> > > > create mode 100644
> > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/allwinner,xr819.txt
> > >
> > > Like I asked already last time, AFAICS there is no upstream xr819
> > > wireless driver in drivers/net/wireless directory. Do we still accept
> > > bindings like this for out-of-tree drivers?
> >
> > See esp8089.
> >
> > There's also no in-tree driver for it.
>
> The question is whether we should. The above might be a precedent, but it
> may not necessarily be the way to go. The commit message for esp8089 seems
> to hint that there is intent to have an in-tree driver:
>
> """
> Note that at this point there only is an out of tree driver for this
> hardware, there is no clear timeline / path for merging this. Still
> I believe it would be good to specify the binding for this in tree
> now, so that any future migration to an in tree driver will not cause
> compatiblity issues.
>
> Cc: Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@aosc.xyz>
> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> """
>
> Regardless the bindings are in principle independent of the kernel and just
> describing hardware. I think there have been discussions to move the
> bindings to their own repository, but apparently it was decided otherwise.

Yeah, I guess especially how it could be merged with the cw1200 driver
would be very relevant to that commit log.

Maxime

--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-10-04 12:13    [W:0.046 / U:0.112 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site