[lkml]   [2017]   [Oct]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: regression in 4.14-rc2 caused by apparmor: add base infastructure for socket mediation
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 8:54 PM, James Morris <> wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Oct 2017, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> I'm *very* unhappy with the security layer as is
> What are you unhappy with?

We had two big _fundamental_ problems this merge window:

- untested code that clearly didn't do what it claimed it did, and
which caused me to not even accept the main pull request

- apparmor code that had a regression, where it took three weeks for
that regression to be escalated to me simply because the developer was
denying the regression.

Tell me why I *shouldn't* be unhappy with the security layer?

I shouldn't be in the situation where I start reviewing the code and
go "that can't be right".

And I *definitely* shouldn't be in the situation where I need to come
in three weeks later and tell people what a regression is!


 \ /
  Last update: 2017-10-26 21:03    [W:0.047 / U:0.756 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site