Messages in this thread | | | From | Masahiro Yamada <> | Date | Thu, 26 Oct 2017 10:49:28 +0900 | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Coccinelle: make DEBUG_FILE option more useful |
| |
Hi Julia,
2017-10-15 18:55 GMT+09:00 Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>: > Make coccicheck checked for the existence of DEBUG_FILE on each semantic > patch, and bailed if it already existed. This meant that DEBUG_FILE was > useless for checking more than one semantic patch at a time. Now the check > is moved to the start of make coccicheck, and the 2> is changed to a 2>> to > append to the file on each semantic patch. Furthermore, the spatch command > that is run for each semantic patch is also added to the DEBUG_FILE, to > make clear what each stdout trace corresponds to. > > Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr> >
I think this is a good improvement, and looks almost good to me.
Just one nit.
> > } > > +if [ "$DEBUG_FILE" != "/dev/null" -a "$DEBUG_FILE" != "" ]; then > + if [ -f $DEBUG_FILE ]; then > + echo "Debug file $DEBUG_FILE exists, bailing" > + exit > + fi > + touch $DEBUG_FILE
I think this "touch" is redundant.
If the DEBUG_FILE does not exist, 2>> will automatically create it.
> +else > + DEBUG_FILE="/dev/null" > +fi > + > if [ "$COCCI" = "" ] ; then > for f in `find $srctree/scripts/coccinelle/ -name '*.cocci' -type f | sort`; do > coccinelle $f >
-- Best Regards Masahiro Yamada
| |