lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Oct]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [GIT PULL] Documentation: Add a file explaining the requested Linux kernel license enforcement policy
On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 10:16:12PM +0300, Pavel Nikulin wrote:
> If you say that your lawyers have comprehensively researched that,
> I can't say they did a good job.

Is there a open source knowledgable lawyer that you recommend we work
with in place of the ones that were consulted for this statement?

Remember, get two lawyers in a room, and you now have 3 opinions :)

I know that not everyone we consulted agreed with everything in the
document, but that's to be expected. However, they all agreed that for
the issue we are currently facing, this statement will make a difference
and help resolve the issue.

If you don't agree with this, that's great, don't sign onto the
agreement. But as you don't seem to be part of our community in the
first place, I don't really understand your concern here at all.

thanks,

greg k-h

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-10-23 09:51    [W:0.813 / U:0.076 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site