lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Oct]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: v4.14-rc3/arm64 DABT exception in atomic_inc() / __skb_clone()
From
Date
Sadly, the syzkaller characterized it as a non-reproducible bug and there were empty
repro files. But if manually executing in VM like this “./syz-execprog -executor=
./syz-executor -repeat=0 -procs=16 -cover=0 crash-log”, it crashed when executing exactly
program 1056 using log0 provided.

I failed to generate the C reproducer with syz-repro as it said “no target compiler”
in the final step. I would appreciate if you could give some hints.

Thanks,
Wei
> On 20 Oct 2017, at 7:14 AM, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 10:16:08PM -0400, Wei Wei wrote:
>> Hi all,
>
> Hi,
>
>> I have fuzzed v4.14-rc3 using syzkaller and found a bug similar to that one [1].
>> But the call trace isn’t the same. The atomic_inc() might handle a corrupted
>> skb_buff.
>>
>> The logs and config have been uploaded to my github repo [2].
>>
>> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/10/2/216
>> [2] https://github.com/dotweiba/skb_clone_atomic_inc_bug
>
> These do look very similar to what I was hitting; all appear to be
> misaligned atomics in the same path.
>
> I see that you have some empty repro files in [2]. If you have any
> reproducers, would you mind sharing them?
>
> If any of those are smaller or more reliable than the one I was able to
> generate [3], it might make it more obvious what's going on, and/or make
> it simpler to come up with a plain C reproducer.
>
> Thanks,
> Mark.
>
> [3] https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/mark/bugs/20171002-skb_clone-misaligned-atomic/syzkaller.repro

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-10-22 17:42    [W:0.170 / U:0.212 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site