lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Oct]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 1/2] staging: Introduce NVIDIA Tegra20 video decoder driver
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 4:26 PM, Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 18.10.2017 00:13, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Thierry Reding
>> <thierry.reding@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 03:13:54PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> [...]
>>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/tegra/nvidia,tegra20-vde.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/tegra/nvidia,tegra20-vde.txt
>>> [...]
>>>>> +- resets : Must contain an entry for each entry in reset-names.
>>>>> + See ../reset/reset.txt for details.
>>>>> +- reset-names : Must include the following entries:
>>>>> + - vde
>>>>
>>>> -names is pointless when there is only one.
>>>
>>> I'd prefer to keep it. In the past we occasionally had to add clocks or
>>> resets to a device tree node where only one had been present (and hence
>>> no -names property) and that caused some awkwardness because verbiage
>>> had to be added to the bindings that clarified that one particular entry
>>> (the original one) always had to come first.
>>
>> The order should be specified regardless of -names and the original
>> one has to come first if you add any. That's not awkwardness, but how
>> bindings work.
>
> Probably it would be okay to remove '-names' from the binding doc, but keep them
> in the actual DT, wouldn't it?

No. Then where are the names documented?

Rob

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-10-22 17:30    [W:0.051 / U:2.692 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site