[lkml]   [2017]   [Oct]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH v9 for 4.15 01/14] Restartable sequences system call
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 04:19:41PM +0000, Ben Maurer wrote:
> Hey,
> > So far the restrictions I see for libraries using this symbol are:
> > - They should never be unloaded,
> > - They should never be loaded with dlopen RTLD_LOCAL flag.
> We talked a bit about this off-list but I wanted to state publicly
> that I think this model works well for our use case. Specifically,
> (1) It reduces complexity by focusing on the common case -- long term
> we expect glibc to manage the process of using this feature and
> registering/deregistering threads for rseq. Unloading isn't a
> challenge in these situations, so why add the complexity for it?

You never install a new version of glibc on a running system, and expect
everything to keep running successfully? Breaking that would not be


greg k-h

 \ /
  Last update: 2017-10-22 17:09    [W:0.121 / U:0.320 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site